Marketing backwards is the right way forward

In trying to convince our audience to act, we are typically tempted to do two things: convert people to our cause and impart vast amounts of information about it. Yikes.  Why does this happen?  Because we’re not working backward.

Marketers set goals according to the action they want people to take and then work backward from there to make that happen. But good causes attack a social problem by starting with a mission and planning forward, putting the focus on the organization. In nonprofit marketing, too often mission, not audience, is the starting point.

You know what I mean.  You go on retreat, wrestle to get consensus on a mission statement, analyze various program options, and then devise a “strategic plan” or “strategic vision” based on a staff-driven understanding of the cause and its goals. The exercise is all about collective reasoning, shared decision making, and group consensus. The group wants everyone to agree on a direction, and so the direction is determined by the perspective of the group. The marketing plan is then an outgrowth of that process.

This process is ultimately an inwardly turned exercise. By contrast, marketing is outwardly turned. Because marketing starts with an end result for a specific audience, it challenges us to dwell in the world of our audiences and their marketplace. Audience actions, not our own ideas, are its focus. To do marketing planning, we have to get beyond our far-off mission (like helping people overcome poverty, increasing consumer access to affordable health care, or strengthening schools) and zero in on specific audience actions that are tangible, achievable, and measurable.

In other words, go backwards.

Comments

Very interesting

Posted by Cvetomira  on  03/27  at  10:00 AM

Thanks for the great article.  Great point, but it is difficult to convince the board of this when I am not even sure how to do it ...

Posted by Hester  on  03/27  at  07:54 PM

You may be on to something! Thanks.

What are some examples of this kind of thinking?

You’ve outlined how an inward-style approach proceeds. What’s an example of an approach that is audience-centered.

I’d love to explore this further.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  03/28  at  11:43 PM

You know, this was a pleasant read.  You made a lot of sense and I’m not going to forget what you wrote.

Posted by Jerry Crunch  on  03/29  at  09:02 PM

Great thx

Posted by Tonny Joint  on  03/30  at  02:19 AM

Great stuff!!! Keep up the good work!!

Posted by causes  on  04/01  at  05:47 AM

Thanks for sharing information.Please keep sharing.Keep it up.

Posted by myleadsystempro  on  04/04  at  10:59 AM

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Preview Comment:



Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


<< Back to main