Conversational marketing

Check out this free summary of the book, Beyond Buzz: The Next Generation of Word of Mouth Marketing.  It’s intriguing.

Author Lois Kelly says “buzz marketing” misses the point.  What you should be focused on is not creating “buzz” but rather engaging in interesting conversations with your audience. 

Why?

Because people increasingly don’t trust sales and marketing.  They are bombarded with information.  They want to be heard and have a say.

So how do you do have a conversation instead of a marketing message? 

Listen and make people feel heard.  Get beyond typical messages and value propositions and focus on interesting topics of conversation.  When people respond, respond back.  Make fewer brochures and have more two-way communications.  Hire people who like to have those conversations.

I fully endorse these ideas.  When I have taken the time to ask people their opinions, listened, responded, and continued the conversation, great things happened.

Want a good example?  Check out Lois’s blog post on Nike’s ad after the Imus debacle.

Here is the conversation Nike started in an ad:

“Thank you, ignorance.

Thank you for starting the conversation.

Thank you for making an entire nation listen to the Rutgers’ team story. And for making us wonder what other great stories we’ve missed.

Thank you for reminding us to think before we speak.

Thank you for showing us how strong and poised 18 and 20-year-old women can be.

Thank you for reminding us that another basketball tournament goes on in March.

Thank you for showing us that sport includes more than the time spent on the court.

Thank you for unintentionally moving women’s sport forward.

And thank you for making all of us realize that we still have a long way to go.

Next season starts 11.16.07.”

I’m ready to go buy Nikes.

The conversation approach has worked amazingly well for Six Degrees.

Have you had success in conversations or two-way communication with your audiences?  I will send my Robin Hood book and post the story of the first two people who respond to this question here on the blog. Please respond, we need to learn from you.

Posted by on 05/03 at 02:00 PM


The trackback URL for this entry is:

  1. jenna jamison

    jenna jamison
    Tracked on: jenna jamison (202.7.176.133) at 2007 09 20 00:01:25
  2. invention patenting

    invention patenting
    Tracked on: invention patenting (205.143.52.29) at 2007 08 14 14:12:13
  3. Cuckold husbands

    Cuckold slave husbands
    Tracked on: Cuckold slave husbands (66.101.130.2) at 2007 08 13 14:16:32

  4. Comments


    Last year we did a “listening process” with our members, asking them how things were going and having a conversation about our work. The results were interesting, but the impact was amazing.

    We learned a lot about what we should be doing and strengthened our relationships with our members. It helped in our Board recruitment and started as a springboard for new programs and changes in our structure.

    Our biggest challenge has been continuing the conversation after the “project” ended. We’re still trying to figure out how best to do that, and we’re open for suggestions.

    Posted by Chuck Warpehoski  on  05/03  at  03:56 PM

    Similar to Chuck’s experience, we hosted focus groups with our most passionate donors and asked them why they support our organization, how they became involved, why they stay with us, and what we can do to maintain and grow our support base.  Not only did we get amazing information from them (and ideas for new programs), we also made them more personally involved in our organization.  Supporters who are approached and are a part of the planning process will be some of the most loyal supporters over the life of the organization, I believe!

    Posted by Kelly  on  05/03  at  04:14 PM

    Interestno. It is eventual it is correct. But it is not needed to bend from by compliments. And with gratitudes. Also begin to destroy from itself

    Posted by SergKh  on  05/04  at  01:34 AM

    Thank you Chuck and Kelly!  Please email me at robinhood at networkforgood.org and I’ll send you a book.  Also, any more details on your experience (what you asked, what people responded, what resulted) would be great so I can post on them.—Katya

    Posted by Katya  on  05/04  at  08:28 AM

    Now that I’m not racing the 2 comment clock (or the time to go clock), here are some more details.

    Here are some things we did well in our project:
    --We invited a broad group of folks to be part of the converstation: donors, activists, community partners, etc.;
    --We acted on what we heard. For example, we heard a lot of people say that they wanted to hear more about the faith components of people’s connections to peace and justice, so we added more of that to our programming.
    --We Shared the results broadly so that everyone could continue to see what others were saying and deepend the converstation.

    There is one weak spot in our program that I do regret. We didn’t do enough 1 on 1 follow up with people who shared their personal information. There was an opportunity to have lots of personal conversations, which would have led to increased involvement, but we didn’t have the capacity for that.

    The results from the project are online at icpj.net/listeningproject

    Posted by Chuck Warpehoski  on  05/04  at  08:55 AM

    People need more information before making some buying or sales. They won’t buy more than a toaster, before getting some information

    Posted by Schultz  on  05/04  at  03:57 PM

    super site!

    Posted by tramadol  on  05/16  at  03:33 AM

    nice site, thank you

    Posted by Diego Perdoles  on  07/04  at  06:24 PM

    I have to agree 100% with the “don’t trust sales and marketing”.  I have become disillusioned with dishonest that has crept into the sales and marketing arena.

    Posted by Sports  on  03/15  at  11:03 PM
    Page 1 of 1 pages

    Name:

    Email:

    Location:

    URL:

    Smileys

    Preview Comment:



    Remember my personal information

    Notify me of follow-up comments?

    Submit the word you see below:


    << Back to main